5 Comments
User's avatar
crypto research regulation lab's avatar

Strong framing. The Jevons analogy is directionally persuasive — especially on cost compression and expanded access.

But in finance, the paradox only activates under very specific conditions:

- Stablecoins are legally treated as payments infrastructure

- Banks are allowed to integrate them at scale

- Cross-border usage is politically tolerated

And that’s not a technological question. It’s a sovereignty one.

The paradox only works if regulators allow scale.

Stablecoins aren’t coal. They’re dollar liabilities.

So the real expansion question becomes: who controls the new infrastructure layer?

Coal never faced a run dynamic. Money does.

If friction collapses, velocity rises.
If velocity rises, systemic stress propagates faster.

Efficiency in energy scales consumption.
Efficiency in money scales liquidity risk — unless governance scales with it.

Curious how you see lender-of-last-resort dynamics evolving if on-chain dollar balances become globally systemic.

The AI Hustle's avatar

A very, very interesting read. Stablecoins are about to reshape everything about the financial infrastructure.

Cath's avatar

That's a great read ... Thanks !

davidhallen's avatar

Excellent! Your information is at the leading edge of this financial infrastructure rewiring.

Asim Moinuddin's avatar

Fantastic writeup, money is about to start flowing around the world like water flows in a river.

Excited to be a part of enabling that.