How stablecoins found their story in 9 charts
What the latest data says about stablecoins’ growth, usage, and role in payments
Stablecoins spent years in search of a story.
At first, they were a trading tool, a way to move dollars across exchanges. Then they became a savings vehicle, something to hold rather than spend. Now the data is pointing somewhere new: stablecoins are becoming core financial infrastructure.
Here are nine charts that show what’s driving the trend.
1. Regulation accelerated market growth
For most of stablecoins’ history, regulatory uncertainty capped institutional participation. Then, regulatory clarity happened through the Genius Act. It didn’t create the trend, but it amplified it.
In the U.S., the GENIUS Act established the first federal framework for stablecoin issuance. The shift shows up in the data: Adjusted volume had already been rising for several quarters before the Act passed, but growth accelerated afterward — reaching roughly $4.5T in Q1 2026.
Europe’s stablecoin regulation — the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework — tells a more complicated story. When it took full effect at the end of 2024, several major exchanges delisted USDT to comply with the rules, resulting in a spike in non-USD stablecoin activity that briefly exceeded $40B.
Volume has since stabilized at a higher baseline than pre-MiCA, around $15–25B per month. Regulation created a persistent market for non-USD stablecoins where one barely existed before.
2. Stablecoin commerce is growing
The most structurally significant shift may be in what people are actually doing with stablecoins.
C2C dwarfs every other category by raw transaction count: 789.5M in 2025. But consumer-to-business stablecoin transactions are growing the fastest, more than doubling (128%) year-over-year to 284.6M in 2025 from 124.9M in 2024.
Stablecoin card infrastructure data underscores the trend.
Monthly collateral deposits across Rain-powered stablecoin card programs (including Etherfi Cash, Kast, Wallbit, and others) grew from near zero in November 2024 to over $300M/month by early 2026. Though this is collateral backing card spend, not direct stablecoin spend itself, the trajectory is striking: Stablecoin commerce is on the rise.
3. Stablecoin velocity is picking up
Each dollar of stablecoin supply is turning over more frequently.
Since early 2024, stablecoin velocity — adjusted monthly transfer volume relative to circulating supply — has roughly doubled, climbing from 2.6x to 6x. A rising velocity means demand for stablecoin transactions is outpacing new issuance, so existing supply is working harder.
That’s a sign of a real payments network, one where the underlying currency is being used, not just held.
4. Stablecoin volumes are reflecting more payments
When you strip out things like trading, treasury flows, and exchange mechanics — the bulk of stablecoin transactions — you’re left with an estimated $350–550B in payments between different parties last year.
The business-to-business segment dominates stablecoin payments by volume (unsurprisingly, given the scale). But other segments, like direct consumer-to-consumer, are expanding rapidly — as are payments to and from merchants.
5. Stablecoin payments are currently concentrated in particular regions
Geographically, stablecoin payment activity isn’t evenly distributed.
Nearly two-thirds of the volume originates from Asia, primarily Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.
North America accounts for roughly a quarter. Europe, meanwhile, is about 13%. Latin America and Africa together represent just a sliver at less than $1B.
6. It’s not just cross-border payments — it’s local currencies, global rails
The non-USD story isn’t just European. It’s showing up in emerging markets too, and for different reasons.
Brazil is a clear example. Monthly transfer volume in BRLA — a Brazilian-real-backed stablecoin — has grown from near zero in early 2023 to roughly $400M/month by early 2026. Integration with Brazil’s instant payments network PIX has helped drive adoption.
Though stablecoins are often widely described as a cross-border tool, the share of cross-border activity has actually been falling, not rising.
Intra-country transactions have grown from roughly half of payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026. The implication? Stablecoins are finding their footing not just as a remittance or FX tool, but as a local payments medium that happens to run on global infrastructure.
***
Put it all together and a coherent picture emerges, though it’s not the one most people expected: Many people thought stablecoins would be all about cross-border transactions. Instead, they’re becoming more local. And while the U.S. dollar dominates today as the fiat currency backing the vast majority of stablecoins, stablecoins are not purely dollar exports. Non-USD variants like euro-backed and Brazilian-real backed local currency stablecoins are gaining ground.
And while peer-to-peer stablecoin transfers far outnumber other types of payment flows, increasingly more usage is going to everyday commerce.
Each quarter adds more evidence that stablecoins are developing into a general-purpose payment infrastructure. They’re global by design, yet increasingly local in practice.
It’s still early. But the shape of the system is becoming clearer.
***
Acknowledgments: Thanks to Daren Matsuoka for the first chart, and to Noah Levine and Scott Duke Kominers for helpful feedback and pointing to data sources used in a couple of others.
***
Robert Hackett is features editor and head of special projects at a16z crypto.
Jeremy Zhang is an engineering partner at a16z crypto.
You’re receiving this newsletter because you signed up for it on our websites, at an event, or elsewhere (you can opt out anytime using the ‘unsubscribe’ link below). This newsletter is provided for informational purposes only, and should NOT be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. This newsletter may link to other websites or other information obtained from third-party sources — a16z has not independently verified nor makes any representations about the current or enduring accuracy of such information. Furthermore, the content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors in any a16z funds. Please see a16z.com/disclosures for additional important details, including link to list of investments.














stablecoins going local instead of cross-border — nobody saw that coming
Great report but i believe the numbers for BRLA are not accurate... In all sources that i have checked their monthly turnover does not exceed USD 40 mm . Ther numbers you present are 10x this... Would you mind check it please? It does not change the direction and conclusions, but the order of magnitude is different